The past months have been bombarded with certain issues about faith. The media and the press have been very active in covering and presenting these issues to the public. There were many documentaries about these issues that went on air. There were also numerous books about these subjects that have been published and released worldwide. In short, the world is very active and curious in knowing and entertaining these issues.
§§§
In the year 2003, Dan Brown’s novel “The Da Vinci Code” was released worldwide. It invited a lot of supporters, but at the same time critics. It actually went on center stage for presenting historically authentic facts implying historically questionable details and faith questioning ideas. What was more intriguing is that it hurt the Christian denomination of the world by presenting the historical Jesus in a way contradictory to what we have believed in. The novel simply posted erroneous impressions on some fundamental truths about our Christian faith. The novel claimed that Jesus is merely human, and his divinity was merely invented by the Christian-convert Emperor Constantine the Great in the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. It also stated that Jesus found love in Mary Magdalene and had children with her, believing that his bloodline still exists when the latter went to France. It also suggests that the Church conspired with some organizations in the choice of the Canonical Gospels, primarily to keep the secret regarding Jesus and his bloodline. These claims are contradictory to the historical Jesus that we know. These claims are a slap to the Christian faith, the most striking is the question about the divinity of Christ. Well, although a work of fiction, the novel has been seen by many as historically factual because of the author’s frequent reference of historically factual and accurate events. But as Catholic faithful, we should always see this as merely a work of the imagination, a fictionalized literature.
To counter the claims of the novel, we should always respond to them in the light of our faith. We should know by heart and reflect on our Christian faith, grounded on the apostles of the Lord Jesus Christ.
On the claim that Jesus is merely human. Both tradition and Scripture have affirmed the mystery of Jesus’ nature. Jesus is fully human. Jesus is fully divine. The truth about Jesus cannot be seen by historical reconstruction and guess of the human mind. The truth about Jesus can be seen through faith and reason. “The truth about Jesus as the Son of God comes from a revelation of the Father, as Jesus told Peter (cf. Mt 16:17). The truth about Jesus as Lord can be confessed only in humble faith that is a gift of the Holy Spirit, as St. Paul reminds us (cf. I Cor 12:3). The truth about Jesus is revealed to mere children but hidden to the wise and the learned (cf. Matthew 11:25)” (CBCP Pastoral Statement on “The Da Vinci Code,” par. 4).
On the claim that Constantine invented Jesus’ divinity. The Council of Nicaea (325) was convened primarily to counter the Arian heresy, claiming that Jesus is not fully divine and that he was less than the Father. This heresy disunited the Christian empire. In effect, the council condemned the Arian heresy and definitively proclaimed the unique relationship of the Father and the Son (cf. CCC 465). “The Church thus confesses that Jesus is inseparably true God and true man. He is truly the Son of God who, without ceasing to be God and Lord, became a man and our brother” (CCC 469).
On Mary Magdalene. The Holy Grail came about during the Medieval Ages when the Arthurian Romances came about. The grail was said to be the cup of the Last Supper where Jesus drank. Hence, the author’s claim is not chronologically accurate since the idea of the grail came 12 centuries after the Lord Jesus Christ. And Mary Magdalene, obviously, is not the grail of the Lord. They were not even married. “The mythical marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene does not advance a deeper appreciation for the feminine, but destroys the truth about the covenantal union between God and humanity that has taken place in the marriage between Jesus and his true Bride, the Church.” (Handling Questions People may ask about The Da Vinci Code). Rather, we should always bear in mind that Jesus is the Bridegroom, and the Church is the Bride of Christ (cf. Mt 9:15; Mk 2:19). Jesus did not come to the world to establish earthly kingdoms, but he came here to conquer sin and death. Let’s just think of it this way: if Jesus were married to Mary Magdalene, were a mortal prophet, and were to re-establish an earthly and political kingdom, then Jesus would have failed in his mission from God and Christianity would have definitely been a lie (cf. Handling Questions People may ask about The Da Vinci Code).
As Christian readers and moviegoers, we should always have in mind that the novel and adapted film, “The Da Vinci Code” is merely a work of the mind, a highly fictionalized work. It does not mean that the use of historically correct events makes the novel correct as well. I will repeat: the work of Dan Brown is merely a work of fiction, a work of the mind.
§§§
A few months ago, the National Geographic Society announced the discovery of a lost archaic manuscript written in papyrus sheets about 1,700 years ago, nearly dating to 300 AD, written in the Coptic dialect, a language formerly spoken in Egypt. At the end of the manuscript is written in Coptic dialect the ending statement, which attributes to the title, maybe, of the manuscript: The Gospel of Judas. Contrary to Dan Brown’s “The Da Vinci Code,” the Gospel of Judas is historically authentic, meaning that the date of writing at about 1700 years ago and that the manuscript is a genuine work of apocryphal literature was affirmed by means of carbon dating and other highly technological equipment, and is neither a fictitious nor non-fictitious writing. Although attributed to Judas Iscariot, the writer of the gospel is not known because of the time element. Judas Iscariot may have not written this because the manuscript is dated at about 300 AD, and we know for a fact that Judas Iscariot committed suicide the same day Jesus was crucified. Hence, the writer of this gospel would have been a person who lived centuries after Jesus Christ; hence, the canonicity and accuracy of events would be questionable. The Gnostics were attributed to this gospel. The colors of Gnosticism are imbibed in the use of words and imageries in this literature.
Striking about this gospel is its portrayal of Judas Iscariot and Jesus Christ. By the way, this gospel centers mostly on conversations between Jesus and Judas Iscariot.
The portrait of Judas Iscariot. In the Canonical Gospels, we know that Judas Iscariot is portrayed as the betrayer of Jesus Christ, a traitor among the twelve disciples. “Then Satan entered into Judas, the one surnamed Iscariot, who was counted among the Twelve, and he went to the chief priests and temple guards to discuss a plan for handing him over to them. They were pleased and agreed to pay him money. He accepted their offer and sought a favorable opportunity to hand him over to them in the absence of a crowd” (Luke 22:3-6). However, in the gospel attributed to him, Judas Iscariot is portrayed as a very wise man who could understand the Lord and the most favored apostle of Christ. What’s more striking is that Jesus is the one who tells Judas to hand him over to the Jews. When Judas worries about being discriminated and ridiculed, Jesus promises him that in doing so, he will be great and more favored by him. The bottom line is: Judas Iscariot is an obedient apostle of Christ, rather than a reviled traitor, willing to collaborate with the Lord as he says so. Well we do not exactly know why Jesus would arrange for his own death. Well, this is very and obviously misleading.
The portrait of Jesus Christ. What is even more disturbing in this gospel is its portrayal of our Lord Jesus Christ. Imagine our Lord Jesus Christ, arranging for his own death. Well, in this gospel, Jesus commands Judas Iscariot to arrange for his handing over to the Jews. The truth behind this, according to the gospel, is that Jesus wants to get rid of his own body to liberate the real spirit and divinity that is being jailed by this mortal being. This is disturbing to us Christians because we cannot believe that Jesus himself would renounce his Incarnation, that is, “And the Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us, and we saw his glory, the glory as of the Father’s only Son, full of grace and truth” (Jn 1:14). The historical Jesus that is close to our faith gives importance to his full humanity. Even after his Resurrection, Jesus decides to keep his body and show himself to his disciples as a full human being. Another striking about this gospel is its portrayal of Jesus at the Last Supper. Jesus is laughing…laughing hard at that. He is laughing not because he is happy, but he is laughing at his disciples for their wrong notion about God. This made his disciples very angry with him.
The authenticity of the Gospel of Judas is proven – it is a matter of science. But the accuracy of events and theology of belief is a work of faith. One needs great faith in order to decipher the truth and accuracy of the events portrayed in this literature. Besides, we have a very good and dependable Jesus in our faith. So why test him and look for other Jesus’s?
§§§
We are faced with three Christ’s: the Christ of our faith who so loved the world that he suffered, died and rose from the dead for our salvation, who is human in every way and did not deny his divinity, who loved his disciples and ate with them and played with them as if they were a family; the Christ of Dan Brown who was portrayed as marrying Mary Magdalene and having children with her, who was claimed as mere human and denied his divinity; and the Christ of the Gnostics who so wanted to be liberated from his body and to live out his divinity through his spirit and paved the way for his death by arranging it with Judas Iscariot.
But the question is: whom do we choose? Whom do we believe in? There is only one Christ that we must believe in. It is a matter a faith. Be intelligent in choosing. Use your heart. Use the gift of reason that God gave you. Once you choose the right Christ, you will see the light of salvation made possible for us all. God bless us all! Amen.